<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Societatea civila si remodelarea indivizilor</title>
		<description>Comentarii legate de Societatea civila si remodelarea indivizilor</description>
		<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:50:27 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/306/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Alex Nicolin a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-663</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Si eu sunt de parere ca ajutorul alimentar constant pentru tarile sarace ar fi trebuit conditionat de implementarea unor programe de control a populatiei, care sa atinga anumite tinte. Hranirea asistatilor - fie ca e vorba de guverne sau indivizi - e contraproductiv a, pentru ca nu face decat sa incurajeze comportamente iresponsabile din partea lor. De exemplu, africanii au continuat sa se impuieze, desi nu aveau ce manca - foamea e probabil un afrodisiac grozav - si datorita ajutoarelor venite din partea ONU si altor organizatii.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alex Nicolin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 23:11:09 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-663</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TN a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-660</link>
			<description><![CDATA[continuare A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is world government. … It will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishments of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population, it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. Bertrand Arthur William Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1953), pp. 103-104, 111.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TN</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-660</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TN a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-659</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Stiinta lui Russell: I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. … War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. …]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TN</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:58:59 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-659</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mihai a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-658</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Da, definitia lui Russell e buna, dar incompleta (lucru explicabil avand in vedere mentalitatea lui). Spun ca este incompleta deoarece adevarul cu care se ocupa stiinta este un adevar ce priveste un domeniu particular si restrans al realitatii. In niciun caz nu are nimic de-a face cu Realitatea in plenitudinea ei sau cu aspectele ei esentiale. Stiinta e legitima si poate produce rezultate pozitive in limitele ei. Dar atunci cand ea se transforma in scientism, intra cu bocancii in sufrageria unor domenii in care nu are niciun cuvant legitim de spus- precum filosofia sau teologia- lucru pe care-l face si individul din filmul de mai jos.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mihai</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:23:51 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-658</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alex Nicolin a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-657</link>
			<description><![CDATA[O explicare a diferentei intre religie si stiinta. "Science does not aim at establishing immutable truths and eternal dogmas; its aim is to approach the truth by successive approximations, without claiming that at any stage final and complete accuracy has been achieved." Bertrand Russell]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alex Nicolin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:42:57 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-657</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mihai a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Asta ca sa nu mai zic ca exista si in domeniul stiintei, asa cum au existat si in trecut, destule voci care au pus la indoiala sau au si atacat postulatele darwiniste. (si nu, nu ma refer la "stiinta creationista", miscare pe care nici macar nu o sustin, pentru ca are aceeasi viziune gresita asupra competentei stiintei in probleme religioase ca si adversarii ei)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mihai</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:50:37 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-656</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mihai a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-655</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ma amuza foarte tare cum cei care tuna si fulgera la adresa religiei se inclina cu cea mai mare religiozitate in fata tuturor postulatelor scientiste de astazi, luand ca "fapte stiintifice" indiscutabile niste pure ipoteze artificiale. Explicatia darwinista a religiei este o pura aberatie ideologica (formulata de unii care nu inteleg nimic din religie) la fel ca darwinismul in general- totul fiind de fapt o filosofie asupra lume, nicidecum o teorie bazata pe fapte stiintifice. "Faptele" pe care darwinistii le aduc ca argument nu demonstreaza absolut nimic, ele putand fi interpretate in mai multe directii. In general, faptele brute nu spun nimic, ci interpretarea lor. Iar interpretarea nu mai apartine domeniului stiintei. Darwinismul nu a fost decat incercarea de justificare "stiintifica" a unei ideologii care ajunsese deja la putere de aproape doua secole.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mihai</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:43:57 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-655</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alex Nicolin a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-654</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOsOb0QRaQs]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alex Nicolin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:54:39 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-654</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alex Nicolin a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-653</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nu poate fi negata utilitatea regligiei in procesul de selectie sociala. Un anumit tip de religie e util pentru societatile tribale, relativ inchise din punct de vedere social si economic (autosuficiente ), unde interactiunea cu alte grupuri e mai degraba dezavantajoasa o aderenta la niste principii religioase care promoveaza supunerea sociala, si agresivitatea fata de ceialti. Un alt tip de religie e adecvat natiunilor-stat, unde conducatorul este divinizat, insa pe masura ce societate devine una mai deschisa, unde oamenii interactioneaza liber cu semeni ai lor cu o rasa, nationalitate, idei diferite, religia constituie mai degraba o bariera, un dezavantaj. Nu poti avea pace, o economie de piata, comert liber, intr-o lume balcanizata pe linii de fractura sectare. Pe masura ce umanitatea va deveni din ce in ce mai interconectata, relgiia va fi impinsa catre zonele marginale. Dealtfel, fundamentalismu l religios modern nu e decat o reactie la aceasta tendinta.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alex Nicolin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:53:15 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-653</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mihai a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Cat despre consimtamant, nu fac decat sa remarc ca invocarea lui a devenit ratiune suficienta pentru a argumenta in favoarea a aproape orice. De parca orice consimtamant, intre doi adulti, ar fi vreo indicatie pentru discernamantul lor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mihai</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:38:44 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/306-societatea-civila-si-remodelarea-indivizilor.html#comment-651</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
