<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nazistii cu seringa </title>
		<description>Comentarii legate de Nazistii cu seringa </description>
		<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/429-nazistii-cu-seringa-.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 04:31:13 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/429/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>M.  le Commissaire a scris:</title>
			<link>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/429-nazistii-cu-seringa-.html#comment-962</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ai uitat ca de la Adolf incoace am descoperit argumentul aprioric pt mantuirea prin eugenie?! Robert Nozick . . . asks if it would be ethical for our species to be sacrificed for the unimaginably vast happiness of some superbeings. Incredibly, Sam Harris answers, I think the answer is clearly ‘yes.’ There seems no reason to suppose that we must occupy the highest peak on the moral landscape. If there are beings who stand in relation to us as we do to bacteria, it should be easy to admit that their interests must trump our own, and to a degree that we cannot possibly conceive. http://www.toughquestionsanswered.org/2013/08/14/how-does-sam-harriss-metaphysical-view-undermine-his-moral-landscape-part-3/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>M.  le Commissaire</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:15:53 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.karamazov.ro/index.php/polemici/429-nazistii-cu-seringa-.html#comment-962</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
